Actions

Dreaming about having been here before

The sense of having dreamt something before, or of a waking moment matching a dream, is extremely common and is explained without anything unusual. The mechanism is well described and it is worth knowing.

Also searched as: deja vu in a dream, i have dreamt this before, a familiar place i have never been, precognitive dream

Two experiences get run together. Feeling inside a dream that you have been there before, which is a generated familiarity like every other conviction dreams supply. And feeling awake that a moment matches a dream you had.

The second is the one people find compelling and it is the one with the clearer explanation.

Dreams are recalled poorly and vaguely, waking events are specific, and a vague memory matched against a specific event will find correspondences. The dreams that do not match are never counted.

Dreamers frequently report the dream memory becoming more detailed after the matching event, which is the direction memory reconstruction actually runs.

Common associations

  • Generated familiarity, inside the dream.
  • A vague memory matched to a specific event, outside it.
  • Misses that are never counted.
  • Reconstruction after the fact.

Positive readings

The experience itself is striking and is worth having recorded. What makes it useful rather than only interesting is dating the record.

A dated dream journal is the only way to test this, and it is a test anybody can run on themselves.

Difficult readings

Where somebody builds decisions on it, the mechanism matters. The feeling is real and it is not evidence.

Where a matching dream involves harm to somebody, the distress can be considerable and is entirely unearned.

Psychological perspectives

Dreams generate the feeling of knowing independently of anything known, which this database describes across many entries: knowing an unfamiliar house is yours, knowing a stranger is your brother. Familiarity is the same mechanism.

For the waking version, the account is memory reconstruction plus selection. A poorly encoded, vague dream is a loose template, waking life supplies an enormous number of events, and a match is close to guaranteed over a lifetime.

The reported sharpening of the dream memory after the event is characteristic of reconstruction rather than of recall.

Dreams that foretell are a serious category in a great many traditions and are among the most widely known dream narratives in religious literature.

The database records those as beliefs held and states the evidential position plainly, which is that no predictive capability has been demonstrated and the mechanism above accounts for the experience.

Both statements are made, and neither is used to dismiss the other.

What the sleep science says

Reasonably supported: dreams generate feelings of familiarity and knowing independently of content.

Well described: memory reconstruction and selection effects, which account for the waking matches.

Not established: any precognitive capability.

Your own context

  • Had you written the dream down before the event?
  • How detailed was the memory before, and after?
  • How many dreams have not matched anything?
  • Was it familiarity inside the dream, or a match outside it?

If this recurs

If this happens to you, the test is simple and worth doing: write dreams down with a date, before anything matches. It is the only way to find out, and almost nobody does it.

Emotions often reported

  • wonder
  • confusion
  • unease
  • fascination
  • alarm
  • curiosity

Specific having been here before dreams

Each of these is written separately, not generated from this page.

Questions for reflection

These are for your journal, not for us. Nothing you write is shared.

  • Did I write it down first?
  • How much detail did I have before?
  • How many dreams matched nothing?

Dream interpretation is subjective. Nothing here is a diagnosis, a prediction, or medical advice.

Sources and reviewed references

4 references. What these labels mean

  1. 1.Dreaming: A Conceptual Framework for Philosophy of Mind and Empirical ResearchAcademic book

    Jennifer M. Windt (2015) · MIT Press

    Cited for: A modern philosophical treatment of what dreams are, including the immersive-spatiotemporal-hallucination account and the status of dream reports as evidence.

  2. 2.The Scientific Study of Dreams: Neural Networks, Cognitive Development and Content AnalysisAcademic book

    G. William Domhoff (2003) · American Psychological Association

    Cited for: The continuity hypothesis (that dream content largely reflects waking concerns) and a sustained critique of symbolic dream interpretation as an evidential method.

  3. 3.Gender Differences in Dream Recall: A Meta-AnalysisPeer-reviewed research

    Michael Schredl and Iris Reinhard (2008) · Journal of Sleep Research

    Cited for: Dream-recall frequency as a measurable, individually stable trait, and the factors that move it.

  4. 4.Dreaming and the Brain: Toward a Cognitive Neuroscience of Conscious StatesPeer-reviewed research

    J. Allan Hobson, Edward Pace-Schott and Robert Stickgold (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    Cited for: A synthesis of the brain-state differences between waking, REM and non-REM, and what they predict about the character of dreaming in each.

Dreamers’ accounts

How dreams of having been here before have gone for other people, in their own words. Nothing here is an interpretation of anyone else's dream. It is a record of what happened and what it was like.

Nothing here yet. Be the first to say how this has gone for you.

Related records

← All dream meanings